| Etchplanations |
[Jun. 27th, 2009|12:03 am] |
|
O mio babbino caro Mi piace, è bello, bello Vo'andare in Porta Rossa a comperar l'anello! Si, si, ci voglio andare! e se l'amassi indarno, andrei sul Ponte Vecchio, ma per buttarmi in Arno! Mi struggo e mi tormento! O Dio, vorrei morir! Babbo, pietà, pietà! Babbo, pietà, pietà!
- Giacomo Puccini, Gianni Schicchi, 1918
|
|
|
| Return |
[Jun. 2nd, 2009|02:00 pm] |
|
“What is love?” I asked. He let silence linger for a while, ever the bleeding heart humanitarian. It served his purposes, after all, to leave it to occupy a space that would otherwise be empty. A vacant house is never good for one’s reputation. It shows a lack of foresight. He used it to cover up nothing. His brows rumpled in contemplation, as he distorted his being, like a food processor struggling to be thorough but accustomed to failure. He was being perfunctory. As always, he took questions with sullenness that mortified, overlooking the relative frivolity of the enquirer. It puzzled him, eluded him, and because it tried to conceal itself, he wanted to have it even more. He chased after it, as a child would a butterfly. It was his. For a moment, the world looked up, straight at him – the boy dancing in his green dreams. He felt worthy. But not for too long, lest his reservation be misconstrued as indecision, or worse, indifference; or worse yet, ignorance. Pauses, as his teachers had injected into his consciousness, were to be used at just the right moments, lasting just the right time, for maximum results. Two tablets, thrice daily. They prescribed his Gratiano aura, oddly-shaped piece by forced piece. He did not want to be what others wanted him to be, but he was anyway. You can’t always get what you want, they said. He abruptly evicted silence, the ungrateful tenant. He would show no mercy to his inconvenience – not because he held this as moral, but because he had once slighted someone for doing just that. He had said something for the sake of it, not meaning it, and now he had to practice what he preached. Or be called a hypocrite, even though he already was one. There was no choice. His pursed lips, always cautious, always vigilant, guarded his mouth’s teenage inhabitants like a father worn out by those nights wasted waiting on the coach by the door. His jaw, sharpened by reality checks and learner’s outcomes, sealed the perimeter, for his good and for the common good. He was patient zero of the newly fashionable contagion. He knew he was infectious, but he spoke anyway, just because he wanted to – the inconsiderate bastard. His social irresponsibility could have hurt the rest of us. He had to be closed off, quarantined, because we are small and weak and vulnerable and we need to survive in this cut-throat merciless world to which we must belong and must thrive in regardless of what it throws at us and how much we despise its guts. Exhibit A. But now he had been invited, and to be a decent landlord with a general concern for welfare was to be an indecent conversationalist. He was fine with being the contemplative one, but not the quiet, reserved one. The gates creaked, and his mouth opened. He poised his tongue like a famished python, a benevolent Queen, potent but benign. “Love,” he commenced authoritatively, like a judge delivering a sentence. Sparks of fake Oxford cascaded off his intellectual armour, chinking. He was the erudite elder, the sententious sage, banishing silence to haunt the unassuming by using assertive linguistic structure. He continued, slowly, “Love is limitless, unconditional kindness.” The words fell from grace, hitting the ground with a thud, fracturing. Heaven did not deserve their supremacy. But they did not shatter – not yet. They were just traumatized, confused. They were little children who had seen their parents die. They melted, and drained into the earth, tainting wells and springs and lives. Time heals all wounds, but he had already run out of time. Time ran out on him, leaving him with many mouths to feed. He had felt the need to qualify kindness, twice. He had learnt this the hard way. Never have an absolute view, because absolute views are irrational. Nothing can ever be fully justified. Don’t be silly. Don’t be naïve. But his qualifications were not qualifications at all. They were a policy of nuclear ambiguity: subversively, covertly absolute. But no one seemed to realize. Nor care. He wanted to say more. I gave him more than a line to fill, and to give any less than that would look incomplete, no matter how redundant the excess was. He wanted a better mark. “And,” he started, as if jumping up and down, like that godforsaken odd child (we all know one, don’t we?) who never really fit in and no one really understood, throwing a tantrum just to get my attention. He paused, forcing me to anticipate the next word. I refused, and gazed at the floor. He needed to learn. The conjunction, without engines, stalled in mid-air, staving off gravity for a just a while, suspending time, lingering in my mind. I waited impatiently. “And devotion,” he proclaimed, confident that he had requisitioned my interest sufficiently, “without expecting anything…” He trailed off abruptly, as his words and his eyes swirled round and round away into oblivion. He seemed to flicker, like a disobedient lamp, and with each flash he fell further into the chasm he once resolutely stood over and tried to reclaim. The small boy wet his pants and now waddled with his thighs conjoined, but to no avail, for everyone saw his ignominy, and frowned at his carelessness. Their stares riddled his soul. He was not pausing, not resting. He was stopping. He was giving up. His cheeks quivered as his own words passed through his soul, riddling it as much as their stares did. His soft brown eyes looked at themselves, and got lost in their own depth, losing focus, blurring, as his astigmatism got the better of him. It was all clear now. He stared up, as if begging for something. Anything. He was here, but he was long gone. He was so haggard, so old. “In return.” I could barely hear him. He could not return. Not anymore. |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Nov. 4th, 2008|12:32 am] |
Ni ryari izuba rizagaruka hejuru yacu? Ni nde uzaricyeza?
|
|
|
| Existence |
[Jan. 1st, 2008|12:30 pm] |
| [ | Mood |
| | contemplative | ] | Courtesy of Wenjie who koped it from Wikipedia. Give it a read.
But I have convinced myself that there is absolutely nothing in the world, no sky, no earth, no minds, no bodies. Does it now follow that I too do not exist? No: if I convinced myself of something [or thought anything at all] then I certainly existed. But there is a deceiver of supreme power and cunning who is deliberately and constantly deceiving me. In that case I too undoubtedly exist, if he is deceiving me; and let him deceive me as much as he can, he will never bring it about that I am nothing so long as I think that I am something. So, after considering everything very thoroughly, I must finally conclude that the proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind. (Descartes, AT VII 25; CSM II 16–17) |
|
|
| Another year |
[Dec. 31st, 2007|10:51 pm] |
| [ | Mood |
| | amused | ] | Well, some of you might have found my last two posts a little disturbing? I don't know. On retrospect I think it was a little harsh... but I do really feel that way. This world lacks care. (Is that hypocritical?) I'm glad to announce that I'm not so depressed anymore. As usual, my cheering up mechanism kicked in about 3 hours after that (yes, I was still awake then) and basically by the next morning I was feeling much better.
I've kind of wanted to restart blogging for a while... as Nigel says, by expressing my thoughts in words, I consolidate my ideas, and thus get to know myself better. It's called the consolidation through communication tenet (guess who coined such a term). I'll really try to blog throughout the year, but I don't think you can count that as a new year's resolution or anything that serious. I also realize that my blog is likely to become an emo haven of sorts - not that I have any objections to that. XD
Today I got quite worked up again over a certain issue. It's not exactly convenient to elucidate in full here, so I'll be relatively vague about it. Let's just say that certain people don't have the mental maturity to communicate decently. And it's really disappointing and disheartening to note that these people come from our school. One would have thought that, being students of such a ( 1. prestigious 2. elite 3. hallowed 4. famous ) institution, we would have had already acquired some level of thought that allowed us to speak properly without hurling unnecessary and uncalled for insults at other undeserving parties. I'm really tired of this. And I'm sorry to say that perhaps it's these people who give us our reputation for arrogance, ignorance, and low EQs. We could start by cultivating a sense of sensitivity - something which we sorely lack and sorely require.
And on a related point, it's about time people started actually thinking about things. Cogito ergo sum, which as Nigel says, should be the motto for GEP. I'm starting to appreciate its significance on my life even more nowadays. It taught me not just to mug, but to think. And when you really start thinking, you're just renewed as a person. Your existence means so much more. And yet, people seem to loathe, to despise reflection (hence the rationale for reflection being a possible punishment in RICO). It almost seems as if to truly think is to permanently scar oneself - an irreversible aberration from so-called normalcy. I beg to differ. Thinking is probably my life - without it I am nothing. So please, if you have a moment, just think about some real things: yourself, your place in the world, the world, your purpose, your ambition, the meaning of life, human rights, climate change, peace, love... the list is endless.
I should really devote a paragraph to the concert. I must say RICO has smashed away all my expectations once again - they really pulled it off. No easy feat. Well, be it with me or without me, I'm just contented that everything is over, and extremely proud of certain people. I'm not even sure whether the fact that they managed it without me is a good thing or otherwise. I'm inclined to call it good - if they can initiate these complex events without a clear leader, it really shows how dedicated they are, doesn't it? Well, my exco team is certainly workaholic, and I'm very glad that I'm working with the four of them! Of course, my absence couldn't have been overlooked just like that.
That particularly lengthy emo email (technically, rant) I wrote to the egroup the day before I left did have some impact, but apparently some people were still very unhappy. I still have to patch things up with my instructor, particularly. So let me say this again - I didn't quite enjoy my holiday until I got news that the concert was excellent. I was spending half my time worrying about whether things were fine back here, and I really felt bad for the first few days. I'll be perfectly honest - I cried on the way to the airport. I couldn't bear to leave that burden behind. It was like deserting RICO. It was dreadful, and I don't think I'll be able to do it again. That being said, a busy year lies ahead - 3 concerts, 3 performances, an overseas trip... I'm already getting worried about Raffles Trail, not to mention the rest of the big events.
Speaking of CCAs, there's going to be this Student Leaders Organisation (temporary name), comprising CCALs, ACCALs, RIPB, PSLs, and CEC Council, which will practically be arrowed to do every conceivable thing that the school needs slave labour for. They package it so nicely - improved communication, inter-group interaction and sharing, free flow of ideas, feedback mechanism - it doesn't take much to see right through it all. This is outside of all our job scopes. This goes way beyond. We're expected to support more sports matches than normal, and need to lead cheers. Why must we go for their matches when they refuse to turn up for our concerts? This sports dominance is getting too blatant. They have no right to impose this on us and expect us to bother to show up. I'll go - when they start coming for our musical groups' concerts and go watch our uniformed groups and merit CCAs compete at a national (and even international) level. Sports isn't the only group which wins prizes for the school. The rest deserve recognition - failing which, this new organisation will fall apart.
And this gets me started on cheering. I've never liked cheering. I detest it on the strongest terms, as any self-respecting rational person would. Cheering is pretty much meaningless. How many Rafflesians actually mean what they cheer? Cheering is a platform for fake enthusiasm, and if enthusiasm is just fake, why bother showcasing it? If we do it because other schools do it and we'd somehow be missing out on something, we'd be guilty of jumping on the bandwagon - and yet we're supposed to lead, not conform. Further, do our cheers really motivate our players? I can't answer that one, but I think not. If at all, it adds more pressure - and we all know pressure can act both ways. We speak of effectiveness daily, so applying that, just how effective are cheers? Surely pride for the school can be displayed in more subtle yet inspiring ways.
This brings me on to the totally overrated Rafflesian Spirit. Perhaps this ghost did exist, or perhaps it does exist in some minuscule subdued form today. Whatever the case, one cannot reasonably attribute all the achievements of RI students to this phantom shrouded in mystery. Individual virtues, such as determination, courage, pride, and diligence, cannot be chunked together to create an artificial spirit and categorically claimed to represent pride for our school. Whatever we feel for this school may contribute to our achievements on a multitude of arenas (no pun intended), but it certainly is not the sole factor. If at all, we have a Uniquely Singaporean kiasu spirit, not a Uniquely Rafflesian one. Sure, we have a Rafflesian identity, but that hardly justifies acknowledging a separate entity to describe our emotions. The Rafflesian Spirit, in this sense, can be likened to a tissue - it blankets all else, but weighs very little. As Nigel says, we can hold a stake in the school and care about the school - probably the reason why anyone would bother to take up leadership positions, besides LEAPS - but waxing over it so often is not the way to go. Extending this slightly, perhaps the reason we care is that we want the best possible education for Rafflesians.
Alright, before I start ranting on the undue symbolic weight things like New Year and birthdays are given, I'll just take the opportunity to say that I'll try to be nicer next year. I really will. (Is that hard to believe?) I guess I've realized that my friends have totally gone out of their way to help me out some times, so I feel really obliged to stick to the Golden Rule and reciprocate. This doesn't mean I'll be nice all the time though... if you deserve a lengthy dose of critical verbiage to set you straight, rest assured, I'll willingly provide it. As Nigel and Daniel Tan have told me, my form of being nice isn't quite like theirs - it's not a matter of principle, rather a matter of duty. Nonetheless, I hope you'll see me being nicer to all of you.
This post is kind of upbeat compared to the ones preceding it - let's hope my posts keep this way! Cheers to all, and have a magnificent new year. Oh yes, remind me to rant about politics next time. |
|
|
| navigation |
| [ |
viewing |
| |
most recent entries |
] |
| [ |
go |
| |
earlier |
] |
| |
|
|